Не понимаю, на что обиделись производители этого дважды фуфломицина? Нужно было, как с Коркановскими обзорами, вывернуть наизнанку и печатать крупными буквами на каждой пачке: "Призёр конкурса За верность науке"! ????
https://www.rbc.ru/society/08/02/2018/5a7c5a699a794771a9c23364
http://encyclopatia.ru/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2#.D0.90
https://www.rbc.ru/society/08/02/2018/5a7c5a699a794771a9c23364
http://encyclopatia.ru/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2#.D0.90
I do not understand what the producers of this double fuflomycin were offended with? It was necessary, as with Korkanov's reviews, to turn inside out and print in large letters on each pack: "Prize-winner of the competition For loyalty to science"! ????
https://www.rbc.ru/society/08/02/2018/5a7c5a699a794771a9c23364
http://encyclopatia.ru/wiki/%D0%A0%D0% B0% D1% 81% D1% 81% D1 %82% D1% 80% D0% B5% D0% BB% D1% 8C% D0% BD % D1% 8B% D0% B9_% D1% 81% D0% BF% D0% B8% D1% 81% D0% BE% D0% BA_% D0% BF% D1% 80% D0% B5% D0% BF% D0 % B0% D1% 80% D0% B0% D1% 82% D0% BE% D0% B2 # .D0.90
https://www.rbc.ru/society/08/02/2018/5a7c5a699a794771a9c23364
http://encyclopatia.ru/wiki/%D0%A0%D0% B0% D1% 81% D1% 81% D1 %82% D1% 80% D0% B5% D0% BB% D1% 8C% D0% BD % D1% 8B% D0% B9_% D1% 81% D0% BF% D0% B8% D1% 81% D0% BE% D0% BA_% D0% BF% D1% 80% D0% B5% D0% BF% D0 % B0% D1% 80% D0% B0% D1% 82% D0% BE% D0% B2 # .D0.90
У записи 2 лайков,
0 репостов,
922 просмотров.
0 репостов,
922 просмотров.
Эту запись оставил(а) на своей стене Настя Васильева
