ключевые проблемы математического образования школьников, выявленные ФИПИ на...

key problems of mathematical education of schoolchildren, identified by the FIPI on the basis of typical mistakes: "lack of formation of the basic logical culture", "insufficient geometric knowledge, graphic culture", "inability to analyze the conditions of the problem, look for solutions, apply well-known algorithms in a changed situation", "underdevelopment of regulatory skills: find and correct their own mistakes. " The question is: what is taught in mathematics lessons, if not what federal education standards are guided by?

Now about what we have with the Russian language. Here are the typical mistakes that children make in their detailed answers and essays. Lexical mistakes: "Stolz knew how to arrange his time correctly"; "Nature plays a huge role in human life." Speech errors: "you will get into exactly the same case"; "tells the problem"; "Our ancestors will still need this for many millennia to come." Violations of linguistic norms in the formation of the forms of the verb "to drive": drive, drive, drive, drive, drive, drive, drive. The phrase "drink from a saucer" turns into (drink from) saucers, saucers, saucers, saucers. The pronoun "three (friends)" turns into "three", "three", "three", "three". Errors in the forms of comparative and superlative degrees "higher, more honest, better" are not corrected in any way during their studies at school. The trouble is with the third-person singular reflexive verbs, which most children write with a soft sign: "he laughs". And the phrase "they lay down" has been living and prospering since the 1967 release of the film "We'll Live Until Monday."

The phrase "they lay down" has been living and thriving since the 1967 release of the film "We'll Live Until Monday."

Here is the conclusion reached by the authors of the Methodological Recommendations for Teachers: "An analysis of statistics showed low practical literacy of the examinees. Spelling and punctuation norms are mastered mainly at the level of skills, and by the end of schooling, students' skills do not pass into literate writing skills."

Is it a matter of knowledge? No, this is a matter of general culture. More precisely, the general lack of culture in which our children live and study.

Who owes whom
Rosobrnadzor is one of the few agencies that can take credit for real and reasonable steps to improve Russian education. Its first head, Viktor Bolotov, convinced our entire society (or almost all) of the importance of introducing the USE and saved children from having to pass the same exams twice a summer at school and at a university. He was replaced by Lyubov Glebova, who unleashed a real struggle with universities that traded diplomas, brought garbage colleges out of the educational space. This work is still ongoing. And the current leader Sergei Kravtsov, who took this place in August 2013, can already proudly say: "I made the USE honest and transparent."

When can I take the exam
But there are things that Rosobrnadzor is unable to overcome. These are, for example, the problems of the general culture of teachers, their attitude towards children and parents. Everyone knows how our schooling is structured: children must remember a rule or formulation and perform a certain number of exercises to consolidate. The teacher will explain, and the children will remember that "glass, pewter, wood" must be written with two "n". But when the child grows up, he writes "roast rooster", because such a combination of words was not passed in the lesson. This is a question related to the sphere of professional and methodological. If a teacher cannot teach this, then what can he do at all?

Should the school be limited to "giving knowledge" or is it still facing the task of developing children? After all, it is on tasks that require independent thinking that CMMs are built. Whoever says that the exam is a "guess" is shameless