Посмотрел я тут намедни "Матильду". В общем, ожидания...

I looked here the other day, "Matilda." In general, my expectations were met. If you take the director's work - it is pretty high quality. But the script .. That's what it is when the script is written by an amateur, and among the consultants there are no specialists in the subject that is covered in the film. The number of discrepancies of reality and outright blunders was just off scale. Nicholas appeared as a lascivious tantrum; Khodynka was improbably shown. Alix is ​​a superstitious tantrum. Well, the fictional Count Vorontsov, who hit Nikolai, is just below the plinth ... No high-quality shooting, no work of the director is able to outweigh the blunders in the script. If you already take on the adaptation of an episode from the life of people whose path is known almost every minute - if you please turn not to your sore fantasies, but to the primary sources ... At the same time, I did not see anything in the film that would offend the feelings of believers. Unless the sick imagination of Poklonskaya and the members of the sect of the "Tsarozobozhniki" somehow suffered. But this is already a psychiatrist ... They only made an advertisement for a not very good film. And because of them, the apple had nowhere to fall in the hall. And so the hall would probably have remained half-empty ... It’s worth going down, but it must be perceived, probably, as a comedy or a farce. Because the further you went, the more you wanted to laugh, the charter was to count the number of historical flaws and inconsistencies. They occurred approximately every five minutes.